Value Driven Design Logo

6.09 - Design For Assembly (DFA)

Overview

Design for Assembly (DFA) is a team based product design evaluation tool that via structured analysis gives feedback to designers to achieve:-

  • Reduced Part Count
  • Easier handling of parts
  • Simplified Assembly

Evaluation is conducted using the process shown below:-

Design for Assembly - Process

Functional Analysis

By interrogation of the component parts through the methodology, each part can be classified as essential “A” parts or non-essential “B” parts. Given this awareness, re-designs can be evolved around the essential components. Typically fasteners would be classed as “B” parts.

Handling Analysis

All component parts must have the correct orientation before the assembly can take place. The difficulty of achieving this by either manual or mechanical means can be assessed and components receiving high ratings can then be modified to give an acceptable rating. Poke-Yoke devices can be installed in the manufacturing process to ensure zero defects from this source.

Fitting Analysis

To conduct a fitting analysis an assembly flowchart is constructed and the difficulty of assembling each part in the correct sequence can be rated using DFA tables. Difficult assembly tasks and non-value added process are revealed for correction by re-design. Simple concepts such the ability to assemble in layers from above can result in major cost savings at the manufacturing stages.

Each of the above stages in the methodology allows the design to be iterated to achieve the following measures of performance that are accepted as an indication of good design:-

Measure

Calculation

MOP’s

Functional Analysis gives a Design Efficiency =

Essential Parts

> 60%

Total Parts

Handling Analysis gives a Handling Ratio =

Total Ratings

< 2.5

Essential Parts

Fitting Analysis gives a Fitting Ratio =

Total Ratings

< 2.5

Essential parts

Typical results achieved by the application of DFA are as follows:-

  • Part count reduction

30%

  • Assembly Cost Reduction

40%

  • Product cost reduction

35%

It should also be noted that fewer parts also means:-

  • Reduced Inventory
  • Fewer Invoices from Fewer Suppliers
  • Fewer Quality Problems

Handling Analysis and some elements of Functional Analysis can be conducted on individual mechanical parts and can be accessed by a CAD shape and weight analysis of the 3D solid models of the parts. This information can be held permanently against the part and fed to the DFA software for the calculation of the final overall Design Scores.

Example – Headlight Trimscrew ‘Before & After’ Analysis

Design Option

Design for Assembly Analysis

(1)

Trim Screw old

Design score old

(2)

Trim Screw new

Design score new

Results Summary

Parts

Design Efficiency

Total Feeding Index

Feeding ratio

Total Fitting Index

Fitting Ratio

(1) Original Design

5

40%

16.6

8.3

13.9

6.7

(2) New Design

2

100%

4.5

2.3

3.8

1.9

 
Further Reading